OK now, here's where some people are going to swear I dove into the deep end of the pool and joined the tin hat crowd. Truth be known though, I go where the available facts take me, regardless how stupid it sounds.
Frankly, I hope they're correct ..... I'd rather be wrong than to have what I have come to believe might happen, actually happen.
When flight MH370 went missing back on March 08, to be honest, I didn't think too much about it. Another plane went down ... too bad for the people on board, praying for their souls is good but other than that, oh well. However, when the stories surfaced about relatives being able to call the passengers' cell phones and listen to the phone ring, normally, as if any second someone was going to pick it up, I knew something was fishy.
Cell phones are persnickety little beasts and absolutely will not work when submerged; particularly when submerged in salt water. You see, all cell phones are nothing more mysterious than duplex system radios. No radio will work well when submerged because the water 'shorts' out the signal (for lack of a better explanation) but that same body of water, if a signal is broadcast across the top of it, will act as a signal amplifier and permit the signal to travel further than it normally would. Since the largest cell size of which I have personal knowledge is 20 square miles, that means that there has to be a city nearby, and the plane has to be on/around dry land.
Odd, don't you think, for a plane presumably lost at sea?
And if the plane and the phone are intact, then where is the phone's owner?
Now, this person named Jeff Kagan, has his own view on the subject ......
“We are used to the landline world. When you dial a number and hear ringing, it is ringing on the other end,” he told FoxNews.com via email. “However wireless is different.”
Any ringing the family members heard wasn’t replicated on the other end of the line. Instead, the ringing sound a cellphone makes in your ear is essentially a mask for the emptiness that would otherwise exist as the network looks for and attempts to reach the number you’ve dialed, he explained.
“With a wireless call, you dial and hit send, then you hear ringing. However it is not ringing on the other end. What is happening is the network is searching for the other phone. That can take up to several rings,” Kagan said. “If it does not find the phone, it cannot complete the call.”
Well, I can't comment on this other than to say that as both a cell phone user, and a person who used to be one of the top technical/customer service rep's for Cingular Wireless (damn, wasn't THAT a while ago!) I never heard of the system acting like that .... your phone, even if it's switched off, is constantly involved in making contact with the network, essentially 'shaking hands' with every cell tower you travel past. Each tower has two separate memory units, one for their registered customers (further divided into different classifications) and one for the non-customer's who's carrier might have a contract to be piggy backed on the tower.
Querying the network involves only a quick search command among the routers to see who's registered where, and generally is done before the phone even begins to ring. If you'd like, you can try this for yourself ..... get two cell phones and try making a call to the other one. First with the SIM card in (yes, you do need to have at least one there which still requires a SIM card) and then with the SIM card out. Taking the battery out won't do it as most cell phones of current manufacture usually have a few capacitors which act as batteries. This gives the cell phone just enough power to respond when queried by the network, thus foiling people who think they can become "untraceable" by simply taking the battery out. (the subject for another tirade, another day)
Just in case you were wondering, how my speculation based on personal experience holds up against Mr. Kagan's knowledge of the system? Here's what other industry insiders said on the subject .....
"Representatives for the major cellular carries either did not respond or declined to offer additional details for this story. The CTIA, a trade group representing the wireless industry, also declined to comment, referring FoxNews.com to outside analysts."
Questions?
http://news.discovery.com/tech/gear-and-gadgets/malaysian-air-370-passengers-cell-phones-didnt-ring-140325.htm
But then, other oddities about the flight's behavior began to surface, the transponder was turned off, the ACARS system was turned off (which requires that someone manually remove a fuse) and other such things as would render the plane, if it was still airborne, invisible to the usual means we have to track such things.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/johngoglia/2014/03/08/malaysian-air-flight-mh370-how-can-a-boeing-777-aircraft-suddenly-lose-all-contact/
Then there was the plane's behavior in flight .... reports of the plane ascending to around 45,000 feet before descending to roughly 12,500.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/assessing-the-theories-about-flight-370s-disappearance/2014/03/19/d5d59f5a-af7f-11e3-9627-c65021d6d572_story.html
An interesting thing about aircraft at 45,000 feet .... well ..... just a minute, let's take a look at a pilot's handbook on the physiology of flying to see what it has to say on the subject.
"A human clothed in everyday street apparel, rapidly exposed to an altitude of 45,000
feet, would become unconsciousness in 9 - 12 seconds with death shortly following."
So, if the emergency oxygen system is disabled (according to an aeronautics professor interviewed by one of the many news services about this event, it could be done) people in the cabin would have about 9-12 seconds to notice that something was wrong and storm a reinforced cockpit to take the plane to a lower altitude. Now, does this really sound likely?
How many people get asphyxiated each year by carbon monoxide, in their own homes?
Get the point yet?
All it would take to accomplish this are two people, two people in the cockpit. It doesn't matter which two but the most likely two are the pilot and co-pilot or the pilot and flight engineer.
How would they be compromised?
It doesn't matter at this point, it just doesn't matter because obviously it was accomplished.
So ..... we have a possible means to accomplish this ..... what's next? The location the plane would have been taken to ..... my personal choice because there are airfields there which were constructed by the US and the USSR would have been Khazakstan (sp?) This leads us to the question, if the plane was last tracked on the radar; with a heading suggesting that it was moving northwest of it's original position, then why are they looking in the opposite direction?
http://www.scmp.com/news/asia/article/1459098/search-lost-flight-mh370-shifts-significantly-following-new-lead-malaysia?page=all
"Professor Sun Jinping , a radar signal processing scientist at Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, said he was baffled by the shift in the search region, adding that there was "no room for such a mistake" on any radar system in use today."
"If the radar has been tracking the plane, it can definitely, precisely get its speed," he said.
However, there is an Air Force general with credible statements that the plane is in Pakistan.
Lt. Gen. McInerney discussed why the plane flew to Pakistan.
“LIGNET put out a report, substantiated yesterday, that there sources got their information from Boeing sources, which is covert. Not that they got their information from the Boeing Company because they’re involved in the investigation, that the airplane was in Pakistan. That was confirmed by LIGNET on Monday and I got another source at LIGNET that confirmed it yesterday… I do believe that those people in Pakistan, in the ISI, those people who knew where Osama Bin Laden was and didn’t tell us. I believe those same elements could be involved with getting that airplane into a Pakistan air force base.”
http://counterjihadreport.com/2014/03/22/breaking-lt-gen-mcinerney-says-mh370-is-in-pakistan-i-got-a-source-that-confirmed-it-yesterday-video/
That works too, for the same reason
By the way, the general and LIGNET? As far as I can tell from where I am?
Legit as all get out
OK ..... so we have the possible means, and a possible location, now for the big question,
What's the end game?
Let's say for the sake of argument, you have this state of the art aircraft vanish from the skies on a routine flight, all the media drum up excitement about it trumpeting loudly that the plane is here, then, it's here, then, we were wrong the first couple of times, it's actually over here!
Constantly, John Q Public is barraged with images of how hard the government is working to find this plane .... LOOK we're using the latest surveillance atellites we have to find this plane .... LOOK we're running computer simulations to approximate locations where this plane could be found.
At this point, we're going to sit down for a minute, take a deep breath, and ask the question, why, with all this high tech equipment, can't they find one of the largest commercial airliners made?
Why is it that no one, has been able to verify any of the 'wreckage' found so far? Why does all their proof of where the flight is seem to vanish when they get there?
Welllll, a really suspicious person might think it's because the plane was never there, never missing, to begin with ......
They've known exactly where it's been all along ..... and it's being refitted.
Refitted for what?
There are a couple of possible uses for such an aircraft, one of them even uglier than the first which sprang to my mind. It could possibly be used to deliver a nuclear device to Israel, which would pretty much be a death sentence for whatever country tried that because Israel would never allow that plane into their airspace.
It could also try to deliver a nuclear device to New York city, with pretty much the same result.
But what if the plan, is to run a false flag operation against one of the two countries.
What kind of weapon only needs to get close, without actually landing in the place it's intended for?
What kind of weapon actually has it's performance enhanced, by a certain amount of distance between it, and the intended target?
A nuclear device, used to generate an EMP pulse
http://www.americanthinker.com/2006/04/the_emp_threat_electromagnetic.html
"EMP was discovered as a byproduct of the Starfish Prime nuclear test on July 9, 1962. A 1.5 megaton bomb set off 240 miles over the Central Pacific blew up street lights and TV sets in Hawaii 1,000 miles away, created a mock aurora visible even further, and destroyed a number of orbiting satellites, including the Telstar I, the pioneering telecommunications satellite."
This relatively small device was set off and caused an effect approximately one thousand miles away.
Our coastal territory only extends eight miles into the Atlantic ..... a more powerful device, detonated just eight short miles offshore?
Damn .....
..... and that isn't even factoring the effects of the shockwave and thermal blast.
There'll likely be some sort of 'tidal surge' from the concussion caused by the device.
Properly placed, it doesn't even have to do more than to just get close. If it's within range of the power grid of a country, it can cause a cascade failure across their power grid in addition to charring all the solid state electronics in use, in the target area.
End game?
If it's done to Israel .... well .... it's going to get ugly and we'll likely find ourselves in another mid-east war, and Israel is probably going to be real pissed too.
If it's done to the US, in the area of New York city it'll take out the power grid for pretty much the entire length of the east coast and probably about as far inland as Indiana. The end game there would be the establishment of military law across the country 'to guard against any further disruption of the US government'. This military law would be in effect for the duration of the emergency, a minimum of five to ten years to rebuild the grid. In the meantime, you can figure that all those people on the east coast who have pacemakers and insulin pumps are going to be dead. As are the people who depend on cochlear implants to hear, whose implants will likely be fried inside their heads, the trauma could be lethal.
As for their little declaration of martial law?
Well, a lot can happen in five to ten years .....
This is the scenario I figure is likely, largely because FEMA has been stockpiling supplies in the area at a higher than normal rate, by their own admission.
Then there's also the matter of the Constitutional convention that people are trying to plan, it's currently slated for the end of May, if I recall correctly. People want to impose controls and sanctions on the Federal government because the Federal government doesn't wish to control itself, and has voted itself more raises and benefits than even the Queen of England has ......
Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
I'd really like it if someone could come up with a rational argument against what I think might be in play .... because when I think of this, all I can see is the 'collateral damage' that would result.
Dead women, children, and people who've never harmed a soul in their lives.
I want .... very much .... to be wrong.
But right now, I fear that all we can do is to wait and see ....
If you can think of a scenario which takes in all the facts, that runs counter to mine ..... I'd be real happy for it to be right.
UPDATE 04/18/2014
This update comes to you courtesy of one of my many associates, no, there won't be any naming of names here because this is about the missing airliner, not our group.
So, there is further evidence on the flight's direction and likely altitude, it seems that the co-pilot, one Fariq Abdul Hamid attempted to make a phone call from the plane ... probably shortly after it was being hijacked.
"The Malaysian newspaper New Straits Times reports that Abdul Hamid “made a desperate call from his mobile phone as the plane was flying low near Penang, the morning it went missing.” The brief connection was only possible, experts say, because the plane had “dropped to as low as 5,000 feet” as it flew northwest of Penang. Even at that extremely low altitude, it appears that Abdul Hamid’s attempted call did not go through. It was cut off “because the aircraft was fast moving away from the tower and had not come under the coverage of the next one.”
So, wherever Penang is, the plane had to be flying AWAY from it, in order for the call had to be dropped so quickly (no, I haven't checked a map yet, the information came to me a while ago but I only just had time to give it the attention it deserved) and it also means that anyone who says tries to say that the phone call would ring "while the network was attempting to locate the callee" is, quite plainly, talking through his hat.
http://jhaines6.wordpress.com/2014/04/15/presstv-mh370-call-exposing-911-cover-up/
Now on to another subject, closely related, this body of information also calls another plane hijacking into question .... one which has nearly been forgotten due to the time since the incident. You may want to read THESE articles .....
http://www.globalresearch.ca/ted-olson-s-report-of-phone-calls-from-barbara-olson-on-9-11-three-official-denials/8514
http://www.consensus911.org/point-pc-2/
Now, ask yourself this question .... if they, whoever they may be .... thought nothing of killing, or simulating the deaths of (depending on which theory you believe) three thousand people, why would the deaths of just three hundred even make them blink?
There are a great many more questions which have also been brought to my mind about the 9/11 hijackings but that will wait for another time and place.
Additional Information
Now, according to what they reported about the phone call from the co-pilot, this is pretty much the direction they'd have been taking at the time he tried to contact the ground. According to Google Earth, the distance between the two is somewhere around 149 miles. Now, at cruising speed, would anyone care to guess how soon after take off the call came? It also implies that the co-pilot knew they were in trouble before the plane even turned west. Which then begs the question, was it truly the co-pilot who was talking to air traffic control just before the hand off, or just someone who kind of sounded like him?
Someone who wasn't real familiar with the protocols, maybe?
Now, this map is from Wikipedia and shows the approximate flight path of the plane, as best as we currently believe it to be .......
Any more questions?
Are you beginning to question the official accounts, YET?
UPDATE 04/27/14 HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO MY SON NIKKO!!!!
Well, now that I've got that out of my system, let's get on with the actual reason I'm updating this .... it seems that the device which they're using to locate MH370 is known as the Towed Pinger Locater/TPL-25, which is manufactured here in the United States by Phoenix International.
Now, what is not being broadcast, by the news sources, is that the TPL-25 has a unique capability, it has a self test cycle which nearly exactly can replicate the ping from a black box. Have a look at the specifications for it yourself ......
Self Test / Emergency Pinger
Type: Teledyne Benthos Model #: ELP-362A/PL
Frequency: 37.5 kHz, ± 1 kHz
Operating Depth: 0 to 6,000 msw
Pulse Length: ≥ 9 ms
Repetition Rate: ≥ 0.9 pulses per second
Strangely enough, I don't appear to be able to locate any information on precisely how the Self Test cycle works or even if it's a closed system which can't be "heard" by any device other than the unit being tested.
But .... with the details on the operation of the device not being known, it gives rise to the questions .......
With crews from the sub-hunters, off the record, saying that there is no reason to bring in a specialized device because the black boxes are designed to be able to be located using the regular equipment found on any one of the sub-hunters.
With the TPL-25 being able to generate "pings" itself .......
It then gives rise to the question, could there be more sinister reasons for bringing in the TPL-25?
Could it be that the TPL-25 is being used to authenticate the official story of the government?
Without further information about the "test" cycle, and having that information corroborated, it does leave one to wonder, doesn't it?
Here's the link to the spec sheet from Phoenix, have a look, see if you can find anything else and feel free to let me know, I'll pass on anything I can authenticate.
www.phnx-international.com/specs/MKT-EQPS-006C-00%20Towed%20Pinger%20Locator-25.pdf
17 July 14 ....... UPDATE .....
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/07/11/Dirty-Bomb-Fears-after-ISIS-Seize-Uranium
I don't know about you, but for me, this next bit of news is causing me a bit of concern.
You see ISIS recently got their hands on some uranium, not weapons grade stuff but still uranium. They've also managed to gain control of some bunkers where Saddam had chemical weapons stored.
Chemical Weapons?
You mean the stuff that everyone told us didn't exist?
The chemical weapons which could have easily been manufactured in a "mobile agricultural research station" AS I ATTEMPTED TO EXPLAIN TO PEOPLE, WHO PERSISTED IN BELIEVING THE "EXPERT" .... THE SAME "EXPERT" WHO WAS IN THE PAY OF THE USG?
But now, CHEMICAL WEAPONS HAVE TO COME TO LIGHT AND EVERYONE SCRATCHING THEIR HEADS AND GOING, "OOOOOOHHHHH .... NOW WHERE DO YOU SUPPOSE THOSE CAME FROM?"
So NOW ..... those same EXPERTS are telling us "DON'T WORRY, WE'RE KEEPING AN EYE ON THOSE BUNKERS THAT CONTAIN CHEMICAL WEAPONS WHICH WE TOLD YOU DON'T EXIST, TO MAKE SURE THAT PEOPLE WE TOLD YOU AREN'T DANGEROUS, DON'T GET HOLD OF THE CHEMICAL WEAPONS WE TOLD YOU DON'T EXIST, SO THAT THEY CAN'T GET THEM THROUGH THE WATCHFUL EYE OF THE TSA INTO OUR COUNTRY WHERE THEY CAN POSSIBLY HARM YOU"
I don't know about YOU, but I'M certainly REASSURED ......
One other item worthy of note, ONCE COMPANY, ALWAYS COMPANY ......
Just because they tell us that ISIS is no longer with the CIA, that they're "off the leash ...."
DOESN'T NECESSARILY MEAN THAT IT'S TRUE.
So ...... somebody ....... no matter who it necessarily is ..... has a DELIVERY VEHICLE ...... and TWO POSSIBLE PAYLOADS ......
WHAT IN HELL IS NEXT?
So we wait, hopefully with open eyes ......
Frankly, I hope they're correct ..... I'd rather be wrong than to have what I have come to believe might happen, actually happen.
When flight MH370 went missing back on March 08, to be honest, I didn't think too much about it. Another plane went down ... too bad for the people on board, praying for their souls is good but other than that, oh well. However, when the stories surfaced about relatives being able to call the passengers' cell phones and listen to the phone ring, normally, as if any second someone was going to pick it up, I knew something was fishy.
Cell phones are persnickety little beasts and absolutely will not work when submerged; particularly when submerged in salt water. You see, all cell phones are nothing more mysterious than duplex system radios. No radio will work well when submerged because the water 'shorts' out the signal (for lack of a better explanation) but that same body of water, if a signal is broadcast across the top of it, will act as a signal amplifier and permit the signal to travel further than it normally would. Since the largest cell size of which I have personal knowledge is 20 square miles, that means that there has to be a city nearby, and the plane has to be on/around dry land.
Odd, don't you think, for a plane presumably lost at sea?
And if the plane and the phone are intact, then where is the phone's owner?
Now, this person named Jeff Kagan, has his own view on the subject ......
“We are used to the landline world. When you dial a number and hear ringing, it is ringing on the other end,” he told FoxNews.com via email. “However wireless is different.”
Any ringing the family members heard wasn’t replicated on the other end of the line. Instead, the ringing sound a cellphone makes in your ear is essentially a mask for the emptiness that would otherwise exist as the network looks for and attempts to reach the number you’ve dialed, he explained.
“With a wireless call, you dial and hit send, then you hear ringing. However it is not ringing on the other end. What is happening is the network is searching for the other phone. That can take up to several rings,” Kagan said. “If it does not find the phone, it cannot complete the call.”
Well, I can't comment on this other than to say that as both a cell phone user, and a person who used to be one of the top technical/customer service rep's for Cingular Wireless (damn, wasn't THAT a while ago!) I never heard of the system acting like that .... your phone, even if it's switched off, is constantly involved in making contact with the network, essentially 'shaking hands' with every cell tower you travel past. Each tower has two separate memory units, one for their registered customers (further divided into different classifications) and one for the non-customer's who's carrier might have a contract to be piggy backed on the tower.
Querying the network involves only a quick search command among the routers to see who's registered where, and generally is done before the phone even begins to ring. If you'd like, you can try this for yourself ..... get two cell phones and try making a call to the other one. First with the SIM card in (yes, you do need to have at least one there which still requires a SIM card) and then with the SIM card out. Taking the battery out won't do it as most cell phones of current manufacture usually have a few capacitors which act as batteries. This gives the cell phone just enough power to respond when queried by the network, thus foiling people who think they can become "untraceable" by simply taking the battery out. (the subject for another tirade, another day)
Just in case you were wondering, how my speculation based on personal experience holds up against Mr. Kagan's knowledge of the system? Here's what other industry insiders said on the subject .....
"Representatives for the major cellular carries either did not respond or declined to offer additional details for this story. The CTIA, a trade group representing the wireless industry, also declined to comment, referring FoxNews.com to outside analysts."
Questions?
http://news.discovery.com/tech/gear-and-gadgets/malaysian-air-370-passengers-cell-phones-didnt-ring-140325.htm
But then, other oddities about the flight's behavior began to surface, the transponder was turned off, the ACARS system was turned off (which requires that someone manually remove a fuse) and other such things as would render the plane, if it was still airborne, invisible to the usual means we have to track such things.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/johngoglia/2014/03/08/malaysian-air-flight-mh370-how-can-a-boeing-777-aircraft-suddenly-lose-all-contact/
Then there was the plane's behavior in flight .... reports of the plane ascending to around 45,000 feet before descending to roughly 12,500.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/assessing-the-theories-about-flight-370s-disappearance/2014/03/19/d5d59f5a-af7f-11e3-9627-c65021d6d572_story.html
An interesting thing about aircraft at 45,000 feet .... well ..... just a minute, let's take a look at a pilot's handbook on the physiology of flying to see what it has to say on the subject.
"A human clothed in everyday street apparel, rapidly exposed to an altitude of 45,000
feet, would become unconsciousness in 9 - 12 seconds with death shortly following."
So, if the emergency oxygen system is disabled (according to an aeronautics professor interviewed by one of the many news services about this event, it could be done) people in the cabin would have about 9-12 seconds to notice that something was wrong and storm a reinforced cockpit to take the plane to a lower altitude. Now, does this really sound likely?
How many people get asphyxiated each year by carbon monoxide, in their own homes?
Get the point yet?
All it would take to accomplish this are two people, two people in the cockpit. It doesn't matter which two but the most likely two are the pilot and co-pilot or the pilot and flight engineer.
How would they be compromised?
It doesn't matter at this point, it just doesn't matter because obviously it was accomplished.
So ..... we have a possible means to accomplish this ..... what's next? The location the plane would have been taken to ..... my personal choice because there are airfields there which were constructed by the US and the USSR would have been Khazakstan (sp?) This leads us to the question, if the plane was last tracked on the radar; with a heading suggesting that it was moving northwest of it's original position, then why are they looking in the opposite direction?
http://www.scmp.com/news/asia/article/1459098/search-lost-flight-mh370-shifts-significantly-following-new-lead-malaysia?page=all
"Professor Sun Jinping , a radar signal processing scientist at Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, said he was baffled by the shift in the search region, adding that there was "no room for such a mistake" on any radar system in use today."
"If the radar has been tracking the plane, it can definitely, precisely get its speed," he said.
However, there is an Air Force general with credible statements that the plane is in Pakistan.
Lt. Gen. McInerney discussed why the plane flew to Pakistan.
“LIGNET put out a report, substantiated yesterday, that there sources got their information from Boeing sources, which is covert. Not that they got their information from the Boeing Company because they’re involved in the investigation, that the airplane was in Pakistan. That was confirmed by LIGNET on Monday and I got another source at LIGNET that confirmed it yesterday… I do believe that those people in Pakistan, in the ISI, those people who knew where Osama Bin Laden was and didn’t tell us. I believe those same elements could be involved with getting that airplane into a Pakistan air force base.”
http://counterjihadreport.com/2014/03/22/breaking-lt-gen-mcinerney-says-mh370-is-in-pakistan-i-got-a-source-that-confirmed-it-yesterday-video/
That works too, for the same reason
By the way, the general and LIGNET? As far as I can tell from where I am?
Legit as all get out
OK ..... so we have the possible means, and a possible location, now for the big question,
What's the end game?
Let's say for the sake of argument, you have this state of the art aircraft vanish from the skies on a routine flight, all the media drum up excitement about it trumpeting loudly that the plane is here, then, it's here, then, we were wrong the first couple of times, it's actually over here!
Constantly, John Q Public is barraged with images of how hard the government is working to find this plane .... LOOK we're using the latest surveillance atellites we have to find this plane .... LOOK we're running computer simulations to approximate locations where this plane could be found.
At this point, we're going to sit down for a minute, take a deep breath, and ask the question, why, with all this high tech equipment, can't they find one of the largest commercial airliners made?
Why is it that no one, has been able to verify any of the 'wreckage' found so far? Why does all their proof of where the flight is seem to vanish when they get there?
Welllll, a really suspicious person might think it's because the plane was never there, never missing, to begin with ......
They've known exactly where it's been all along ..... and it's being refitted.
Refitted for what?
There are a couple of possible uses for such an aircraft, one of them even uglier than the first which sprang to my mind. It could possibly be used to deliver a nuclear device to Israel, which would pretty much be a death sentence for whatever country tried that because Israel would never allow that plane into their airspace.
It could also try to deliver a nuclear device to New York city, with pretty much the same result.
But what if the plan, is to run a false flag operation against one of the two countries.
What kind of weapon only needs to get close, without actually landing in the place it's intended for?
What kind of weapon actually has it's performance enhanced, by a certain amount of distance between it, and the intended target?
A nuclear device, used to generate an EMP pulse
http://www.americanthinker.com/2006/04/the_emp_threat_electromagnetic.html
"EMP was discovered as a byproduct of the Starfish Prime nuclear test on July 9, 1962. A 1.5 megaton bomb set off 240 miles over the Central Pacific blew up street lights and TV sets in Hawaii 1,000 miles away, created a mock aurora visible even further, and destroyed a number of orbiting satellites, including the Telstar I, the pioneering telecommunications satellite."
This relatively small device was set off and caused an effect approximately one thousand miles away.
Our coastal territory only extends eight miles into the Atlantic ..... a more powerful device, detonated just eight short miles offshore?
Damn .....
..... and that isn't even factoring the effects of the shockwave and thermal blast.
There'll likely be some sort of 'tidal surge' from the concussion caused by the device.
Properly placed, it doesn't even have to do more than to just get close. If it's within range of the power grid of a country, it can cause a cascade failure across their power grid in addition to charring all the solid state electronics in use, in the target area.
End game?
If it's done to Israel .... well .... it's going to get ugly and we'll likely find ourselves in another mid-east war, and Israel is probably going to be real pissed too.
If it's done to the US, in the area of New York city it'll take out the power grid for pretty much the entire length of the east coast and probably about as far inland as Indiana. The end game there would be the establishment of military law across the country 'to guard against any further disruption of the US government'. This military law would be in effect for the duration of the emergency, a minimum of five to ten years to rebuild the grid. In the meantime, you can figure that all those people on the east coast who have pacemakers and insulin pumps are going to be dead. As are the people who depend on cochlear implants to hear, whose implants will likely be fried inside their heads, the trauma could be lethal.
As for their little declaration of martial law?
Well, a lot can happen in five to ten years .....
This is the scenario I figure is likely, largely because FEMA has been stockpiling supplies in the area at a higher than normal rate, by their own admission.
Then there's also the matter of the Constitutional convention that people are trying to plan, it's currently slated for the end of May, if I recall correctly. People want to impose controls and sanctions on the Federal government because the Federal government doesn't wish to control itself, and has voted itself more raises and benefits than even the Queen of England has ......
Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
I'd really like it if someone could come up with a rational argument against what I think might be in play .... because when I think of this, all I can see is the 'collateral damage' that would result.
Dead women, children, and people who've never harmed a soul in their lives.
I want .... very much .... to be wrong.
But right now, I fear that all we can do is to wait and see ....
If you can think of a scenario which takes in all the facts, that runs counter to mine ..... I'd be real happy for it to be right.
UPDATE 04/18/2014
This update comes to you courtesy of one of my many associates, no, there won't be any naming of names here because this is about the missing airliner, not our group.
So, there is further evidence on the flight's direction and likely altitude, it seems that the co-pilot, one Fariq Abdul Hamid attempted to make a phone call from the plane ... probably shortly after it was being hijacked.
"The Malaysian newspaper New Straits Times reports that Abdul Hamid “made a desperate call from his mobile phone as the plane was flying low near Penang, the morning it went missing.” The brief connection was only possible, experts say, because the plane had “dropped to as low as 5,000 feet” as it flew northwest of Penang. Even at that extremely low altitude, it appears that Abdul Hamid’s attempted call did not go through. It was cut off “because the aircraft was fast moving away from the tower and had not come under the coverage of the next one.”
So, wherever Penang is, the plane had to be flying AWAY from it, in order for the call had to be dropped so quickly (no, I haven't checked a map yet, the information came to me a while ago but I only just had time to give it the attention it deserved) and it also means that anyone who says tries to say that the phone call would ring "while the network was attempting to locate the callee" is, quite plainly, talking through his hat.
http://jhaines6.wordpress.com/2014/04/15/presstv-mh370-call-exposing-911-cover-up/
Now on to another subject, closely related, this body of information also calls another plane hijacking into question .... one which has nearly been forgotten due to the time since the incident. You may want to read THESE articles .....
http://www.globalresearch.ca/ted-olson-s-report-of-phone-calls-from-barbara-olson-on-9-11-three-official-denials/8514
http://www.consensus911.org/point-pc-2/
Now, ask yourself this question .... if they, whoever they may be .... thought nothing of killing, or simulating the deaths of (depending on which theory you believe) three thousand people, why would the deaths of just three hundred even make them blink?
There are a great many more questions which have also been brought to my mind about the 9/11 hijackings but that will wait for another time and place.
Additional Information
Now, according to what they reported about the phone call from the co-pilot, this is pretty much the direction they'd have been taking at the time he tried to contact the ground. According to Google Earth, the distance between the two is somewhere around 149 miles. Now, at cruising speed, would anyone care to guess how soon after take off the call came? It also implies that the co-pilot knew they were in trouble before the plane even turned west. Which then begs the question, was it truly the co-pilot who was talking to air traffic control just before the hand off, or just someone who kind of sounded like him?
Someone who wasn't real familiar with the protocols, maybe?
Now, this map is from Wikipedia and shows the approximate flight path of the plane, as best as we currently believe it to be .......
Any more questions?
Are you beginning to question the official accounts, YET?
UPDATE 04/27/14 HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO MY SON NIKKO!!!!
Well, now that I've got that out of my system, let's get on with the actual reason I'm updating this .... it seems that the device which they're using to locate MH370 is known as the Towed Pinger Locater/TPL-25, which is manufactured here in the United States by Phoenix International.
Now, what is not being broadcast, by the news sources, is that the TPL-25 has a unique capability, it has a self test cycle which nearly exactly can replicate the ping from a black box. Have a look at the specifications for it yourself ......
Self Test / Emergency Pinger
Type: Teledyne Benthos Model #: ELP-362A/PL
Frequency: 37.5 kHz, ± 1 kHz
Operating Depth: 0 to 6,000 msw
Pulse Length: ≥ 9 ms
Repetition Rate: ≥ 0.9 pulses per second
Strangely enough, I don't appear to be able to locate any information on precisely how the Self Test cycle works or even if it's a closed system which can't be "heard" by any device other than the unit being tested.
But .... with the details on the operation of the device not being known, it gives rise to the questions .......
With crews from the sub-hunters, off the record, saying that there is no reason to bring in a specialized device because the black boxes are designed to be able to be located using the regular equipment found on any one of the sub-hunters.
With the TPL-25 being able to generate "pings" itself .......
It then gives rise to the question, could there be more sinister reasons for bringing in the TPL-25?
Could it be that the TPL-25 is being used to authenticate the official story of the government?
Without further information about the "test" cycle, and having that information corroborated, it does leave one to wonder, doesn't it?
Here's the link to the spec sheet from Phoenix, have a look, see if you can find anything else and feel free to let me know, I'll pass on anything I can authenticate.
www.phnx-international.com/specs/MKT-EQPS-006C-00%20Towed%20Pinger%20Locator-25.pdf
17 July 14 ....... UPDATE .....
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/07/11/Dirty-Bomb-Fears-after-ISIS-Seize-Uranium
I don't know about you, but for me, this next bit of news is causing me a bit of concern.
You see ISIS recently got their hands on some uranium, not weapons grade stuff but still uranium. They've also managed to gain control of some bunkers where Saddam had chemical weapons stored.
Chemical Weapons?
You mean the stuff that everyone told us didn't exist?
The chemical weapons which could have easily been manufactured in a "mobile agricultural research station" AS I ATTEMPTED TO EXPLAIN TO PEOPLE, WHO PERSISTED IN BELIEVING THE "EXPERT" .... THE SAME "EXPERT" WHO WAS IN THE PAY OF THE USG?
But now, CHEMICAL WEAPONS HAVE TO COME TO LIGHT AND EVERYONE SCRATCHING THEIR HEADS AND GOING, "OOOOOOHHHHH .... NOW WHERE DO YOU SUPPOSE THOSE CAME FROM?"
So NOW ..... those same EXPERTS are telling us "DON'T WORRY, WE'RE KEEPING AN EYE ON THOSE BUNKERS THAT CONTAIN CHEMICAL WEAPONS WHICH WE TOLD YOU DON'T EXIST, TO MAKE SURE THAT PEOPLE WE TOLD YOU AREN'T DANGEROUS, DON'T GET HOLD OF THE CHEMICAL WEAPONS WE TOLD YOU DON'T EXIST, SO THAT THEY CAN'T GET THEM THROUGH THE WATCHFUL EYE OF THE TSA INTO OUR COUNTRY WHERE THEY CAN POSSIBLY HARM YOU"
I don't know about YOU, but I'M certainly REASSURED ......
One other item worthy of note, ONCE COMPANY, ALWAYS COMPANY ......
Just because they tell us that ISIS is no longer with the CIA, that they're "off the leash ...."
DOESN'T NECESSARILY MEAN THAT IT'S TRUE.
So ...... somebody ....... no matter who it necessarily is ..... has a DELIVERY VEHICLE ...... and TWO POSSIBLE PAYLOADS ......
WHAT IN HELL IS NEXT?
So we wait, hopefully with open eyes ......
